NULR Online
The Northwestern University Law Review Online has been in operation since 2006 and is one of the longest-running online scholarly publications operated by a major law review. We feature short, lightly footnoted pieces on timely and relevant legal issues.
Submissions from 2008
Continuing the Debate About Presidential Debates, Alexander J. Blenkinsopp
(September 25, 2008)
The Influence of Ex Parte Quirin and Courts-Martial on Military Commissions, Morris D. Davis
(September 22, 2008)
Crying Havoc Over the Outsourcing of Soldiers and Democracy's Slipping Grip on the Dogs of War, Joshua S. Press
(September 8, 2008)
No Third Class Processes for Foreigners, Benjamin G. Davis
(September 2, 2008)
If Obscenity Were to Discriminate, Barry P. McDonald
(August 28, 2008)
Finding a Happy and Ethical Medium Between a Prosecutor Who Believes the Defendant Didn't Do It and the Boss Who Says That He Did, Melanie D. Wilson
(August 25, 2008)
The Case for Field Preemption of State Laws in Drug Cases, Richard A. Epstein
(August 21, 2008)
Beyond Guantánamo, Obstacles and Options (Part II), Gregory S. McNeal
(August 14, 2008)
Beyond Guantánamo, Obstacles and Options, Gregory S. McNeal
(August 11, 2008)
Child Rape, Moral Outrage, and the Death Penalty, Susan A. Bandes
(August 7, 2008)
Rediscovering the Law's Moral Roots, Morris B. Hoffman
(August 4, 2008)
What Riegel Portends for FDA Preemption of State Law Products Liability Claims (Part II), Catherine M. Sharkey
(July 24, 2008)
What Riegel Portends for FDA Preemption of State Law Products Liability Claims, Catherine M. Sharkey
(July 21, 2008)
Heller's Future in the Lower Courts, Brannon P. Denning and Glenn Harlan Reynolds
(July 17, 2008)
Ordeal By Innocence: Why There Should Be a Wrongful Incarceration/Execution Exception to Attorney-Client Confidentiality, Colin Miller
(July 14, 2008)
The Significance of Sprint/United Management Company v. Mendelsohn: A Reply to Professors Gregory and Secunda, Mitchell H. Rubinstein
(July 10, 2008)
Sprint/United Management Company v. Mendelsohn and Case-by-Case Adjudication of "Me Too" Evidence of Discrimination, David Gregory
(July 7, 2008)
Competition and Privacy in Web 2.0 and the Cloud, Randal C. Picker
(June 28, 2008)
The Many Mendelsohn “Me Too” Missteps: An Alliterative Response to Professor Rubinstein, Paul Secunda
(June 23, 2008)
A Floor, Not a Ceiling: Federalism and Remedies for Violations of Constitutional Rights in Danforth v. Minnesota, Ilya Somin
(June 19, 2008)
Engaging Capital Emotions, Douglas A. Berman and Stephanos Bibas
(June 16, 2008)
Bargaining in the Shadow of the European Microsoft Decision: The Microsoft-Samba Protocol License (Part II), Seldon J. Childers and William H. Page
(June 12, 2008)
Bargaining in the Shadow of the European Microsoft Decision: The Microsoft-Samba Protocol License, Seldon J. Childers and William H. Page
(June 9, 2008)
Human Rights and Globalization: Putting the Race to the Top in Perspective, Holning Lau
(June 2, 2008)
The Problematic Nature of Contractionist Statutory Interpretations, Brian G. Slocum
(May 26, 2008)
Antitrust Issues Raised by the Emerging Global Internet Economy (Part II), David S. Evans
(May 12, 2008)
Antitrust Issues Raised by the Emerging Global Internet Economy, David S. Evans
(May 5, 2008)
What Twombly and Mead Have in Common, Amy J. Wildermuth
(April 21, 2008)
Sprint/United Management Co. V. Mendelsohn: The Supreme Court Appears to Have Punted on the Admissibility of “Me Too” Evidence of Discrimination. But Did It?, Mitchell H. Rubinstein
(April 14, 2008)
"Too Plain for Argument?" The Uncertain Congressional Power to Require Parties to Choose Presidential Nominees Through Direct and Equal Primaries, Richard L. Hasen
(April 7, 2008)
Climate Change Legislation in Context, Hari M. Osofsky
(March 31, 2008)
The Unavailability Requirement, Aaron R. Petty
(March 3, 2008)
Appreciating Mandatory Rules: A Reply to Critics, Scott Dodson
(February 25, 2008)
Jurisdiction, Merits, and Procedure: Thoughts on Dodson's Trichotomy, Howard M. Wasserman
(February 18, 2008)
Balancing Mandate and Discretion in the Institutional Design of Federal Climate Change Policy, Robert L. Glicksman
(February 11, 2008)
Hot Spots in the Legislative Climate Change Proposals, Carol M. Rose
(February 4, 2008)
Congressional Polarization Due to Maximizing Political Satisfaction: Why Elhauge’s Current Enactable Preferences Default Rule Fails to Avoid the Congressional Deadlock and Polarization that Stems from Expansionist Statutory Interpretation, Timothy J. Droske
(January 28, 2008)
Sad Time: Thoughts on Jurisdictionality, the Legal Imagination, and Bowles v. Russell, Perry Dane
(January 14, 2008)
The Jurisdictional Time Limit for an Appeal: The Worst Kind of Deadline—Except for All Others*, E. King Poor
(January 7, 2008)
Submissions from 2007
Taking the Legislative Temperature: Which Federal Climate Change Legislative Proposal is “Best”? (Part II), Victor B. Flatt
(December 17, 2007)
Taking the Legislative Temperature: Which Federal Climate Change Legislative Proposal Is "Best"?, Victor B. Flatt
(December 3, 2007)
Pleading Standards Should Not Change After Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, Keith Bradley
(November 19, 2007)
Is Dick Cheney Unconstitutional?, Glenn Harlan Reynolds
(November 12, 2007)
Coming Clean About "Junk DNA", Simon A. Cole
(November 5, 2007)
"Ingenious Argument" or a Serious Constitutional Problem? A Comment on Professor Epstein's Paper, Philip Hamburger
(October 29, 2007)
There Is Nothing Pragmatic About Originalism, David S. Law and David McGowan
(October 22, 2007)
There Is Nothing Pragmatic About Originalism, David S. Law and David McGowan
(October 15, 2007)
Selecting the President: A Bad Idea Out There in California, Robert W. Bennett
(October 1, 2007)
Please, Let’s Bury the Junk: The CODIS Loci and the Revelation of Private Information, D.H. Kaye
(September 24, 2007)
Nonjurisdictionality or Inequity, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
(September 17, 2007)
Is the “Junk” DNA Designation Bunk?, Simon A. Cole
(September 4, 2007)
Memo to the President (and his opponents): Ideology Still Counts, David A. Strauss
(August 20, 2007)
Jurisdictionality and Bowles v. Russell, Scott Dodson
(August 6, 2007)
Massachusetts v. EPA Heats Up Climate Policy No Less Than Administrative Law: A Comment on Professors Watts and Wildermuth, Jonathan H. Adler
(July 23, 2007)
Why The Blight Distinction in Post-Kelo Reform Does Matter, David A. Dana
(July 9, 2007)
Originalism and Supermajoritarianism: Defending the Nexus, John O. McGinnis and Michael B. Rappaport
(June 25, 2007)
Massachusetts v. EPA: Breaking New Ground on Issues Other Than Global Warming (Part II), Kathryn A. Watts and Amy J. Wildermuth
(June 11, 2007)
Massachusetts v. EPA: Breaking New Ground on Issues Other Than Global Warming, Kathryn A. Watts and Amy J. Wildermuth
(June 4, 2007)
What Tool Works Tells Us About Tailoring Patent Misuse Remedies, David McGowan
(May 21, 2007)
Is Post-Kelo Reform Bad for the Poor?, Ilya Somin
(May 7, 2007)
Volition and Voltaire: A Response to Professor Bagenstos, Tom Lininger
(April 23, 2007)
Mandatory Pro Bono and Private Attorneys General, Samuel R. Bagenstos
(April 16, 2007)
The Use and Limits of Martin-Quinn Scores to Assess Supreme Court Justices, with Special Attention to the Problem of Ideological Drift, Wade Farnswarth
(April 2, 2007)
The Greening of Harry Blackmun, Stephen B. Burbank
(March 26, 2007)
Ideological Drift Among Supreme Court Justices: Who, When, and How Important?, Lee Epstein, Andrew Martin, Kevin M. Quinn, and Jeffrey Segal
(March 19, 2007)
Justices Who Change: A Reply to Epstein et al., Linda Greenhouse
(March 19, 2007)
Submissions from 2006
Science Fiction and Shed DNA, D. H. Kaye
(December 21, 2006)
