Congressional Polarization Due to Maximizing Political Satisfaction: Why Elhauge’s Current Enactable Preferences Default Rule Fails to Avoid the Congressional Deadlock and Polarization that Stems from Expansionist Statutory Interpretation

Authors

Timothy J. Droske

Publication Date

1-28-2008

Recommended Citation

Timothy J. Droske, Congressional Polarization Due to Maximizing Political Satisfaction: Why Elhauge’s Current Enactable Preferences Default Rule Fails to Avoid the Congressional Deadlock and Polarization that Stems from Expansionist Statutory Interpretation, Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy (2008).
https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/nulr_online/86