Document Type

Article

Repository Date

2010

Keywords

legal theory, judicial decisions, legal realist thesis, wealth maximization principle, critical legal studies

Subject Categories

Law | Legal History | Legal Theory | Public Law and Legal Theory

Abstract

A growing number of legal scholars have recently revived the American legal realist thesis that legal theory does not dictate the result in any particular case because legal theory itself is indeterminate. A more radical group has added that theory can never constrain judicial practice. I will present a spectrum of types of legal theories to demonstrate that the position of the more radical group of writers is correct—that legal theory is inherently incapable of identifying which party should win any given case.

Share

COinS