Abstract
This Article first documents institutional timidity in fair housing enforcement through Rubinowitz’s empirical account of HUD and then extends the analysis to higher education admissions. It shows that universities defending affirmative action uniformly adopted the diversity rationale while declining to argue that race-conscious admissions correct for bias embedded in their own criteria. These choices did not merely weaken outcomes; they also helped produce the doctrinal frameworks that later constrained them. In identifying institutional timidity as a mechanism of doctrinal production, this Article extends Rubinowitz’s insights across domains and into constitutional law. It concludes by proposing strategies that shift civil rights advocacy away from institutions whose incentives make weak arguments rational and toward constituencies positioned to advance stronger ones.
Recommended Citation
Sheldon Bernard Lyke,
Institutional Timidity: Reading Len Rubinowitz Toward a Structural Theory of Civil Rights Enforcement,
21
Nw. J. L. & Soc. Pol'y.
316
(2026).
https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njlsp/vol21/iss2/5
