•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The rural justice gap significantly impacts child welfare legal representation, exacerbating the challenges families face when navigating juvenile courts in rural America. Attorneys in these communities frequently encounter geographic isolation, limited access to specialized training, professional burnout, and inadequate resources, all of which hinder effective advocacy for vulnerable children and families.

This article argues that clinical legal education, when paired with structured post-graduate training and multidisciplinary consultation, offers a replicable model for addressing the rural attorney shortages in juvenile court advocacy. The Nebraska Children’s Justice and Legal Advocacy Center (NCJC) illustrates how this model can be designed and scaled to meet the needs of other jurisdictions. The NCJC combines a law school clinical program, training future attorneys as Guardians ad Litem, with a post-graduate fellowship that enhances the competencies of all practicing rural attorneys in child welfare law. Central to this model are experiential learning, structured mentorship, interdisciplinary collaboration, and reflective practice, each grounded in trauma-informed principles.

Empirical evaluation data indicates that NCJC has significantly improved attorney preparedness, increased sustained commitment to juvenile advocacy, and expanded rural communities’ access to skilled representation. This framework offers a replicable, evidence-based solution that jurisdictions nationwide can adopt, bridging critical gaps in rural justice and ensuring that geography no longer determines the quality of justice available to children and families.

Download

Share

COinS