Abstract
The right to be forgotten is a subject of contention in both the United States and the European Union. In the E.U., the right to be forgotten gives one the right to demand that information—even if published legitimately—be taken down or removed from search engine results. While well-intentioned, this has led to concerns of free press restrictions. In contrast, the right to be forgotten is not recognized in the U.S., although there are scholars who would like to see such a right here. This Note takes the view that introducing a right to be forgotten would be contrary to the first amendment and privacy law frameworks in the U.S., and further is not desirable based on the European experiment.
In 2019 the European Court of Justice held in Google v. CNIL that a multinational platform does not have to comply with E.U. regulations on the right to be forgotten on its non-European platforms. Building on this distinction, this Note suggests an “offshore solution” to host articles and search engines outside the reach of European jurisdictions.
This Note is of interest to scholars and practitioners curious about the right to be forgotten debates, as well as the general differences in jurisprudence between the U.S. and the E.U. in balancing privacy rights against freedom of speech and the press.
Recommended Citation
Jay Kaganoff,
Send the Word Over There: An Offshore Solution to the Right to Be Forgotten,
41
Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus.
245
(2021).
https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/vol41/iss2/4
